Archive for the ‘Memes’ Category
How occultism relates to the NWO in a 3 minute video.
What is normally regarded “consent” cannot be considered consent if: it is forced, coerced, manufactured, mind controlled, silent, inferred, manipulated, uninformed, or misled. I reserve the right to add more to that list as I see fit.
All links provided within this article proves various concepts about which I speak, so I ask you to please take a look at them.
It can only be considered consent if the party consenting knows exactly what all the ramifications are related to that consent.
How many times have you heard or read this phrase: “Silence equals consent“?
I’ve heard it said by many speakers & writers in the so-called “truth movement“. I read recently where it was called a “legal maxim“, and that it was authored by Plato, but is also attributed to Sir Thomas Moore in the form of the phrase, “Silence gives consent“. “Silence equals consent” is the way of the elitist pigs, who run the world, to cheat their own game, which is rigged, by the way.
I mean, we already know the ruling class lie, so why believe a maxim that comes from elitist rulers who have filtered this phrase into the truth movement via their own infiltrators?
People talk about “waking up“… so what is “asleep“? It is when you are so mind controlled you cannot see what the system is doing right in front of your face, you are asleep or unconscious to what is really going on. You cannot “see the forest for the trees”, so to speak. If you are not truly conscious of what is happening, then how can you really give consent? In this case, silence is not consent.
If you are aware of what is going on, but feel helpless to fight the system because you have been: threatened, manipulated, tortured, deprived, or lost your livelihood, then how is there any consent? You have been coerced. Coerced consent is not consent.
Why are people so unconscious? Well, first off, most people are prepped with trauma of some sort, at birth (examples include circumcision, separation from mother, abuse, etc.), or shortly thereafter. Then, they are hypnotized by the flicker rate of TV (which was my babysitter when I was growing up), and then given post hypnotic suggestion via every day phrases like “silence equals consent” or “justice is blind”, as a couple of examples.
That maxim is a lie because silence does not necessarily equal consent. In fact, the maxim of “silence equals consent” is not even accepted in modern English law. More often it equals fear to speak out, or unconsciousness of the motive and the consequence. At this rate, given the various methods of mind control in existence today, sometimes even consent doesn’t really equal consent.
Whether silence equals consent is immaterial since mind control clearly does not equal consent. Regardless of what form it takes, mind control clearly equals removal of freewill. And, without freewill, how can someone give consent?
It’s kind of like the phrase “justice is blind”. They SAY it means that justice is impartial, but that is the lie…. & the system DOES lie to & manipulate the people. The phrase “justice is blind” is like a spell… to make it so justice does not see… so that people do not get true justice. I doubt anyone consented to that except for those who would profit from it.
Even more so, it is like a woman who gave consent to have sex after she had been drugged with ruffies. Was her consent legally obtained?
The stuff we see in the physical world today is the result of control that has been happening for millennia on levels most people cannot even conceive of, much less consider, which is why it works for those with power so well.
Sometimes, consent is SO manufactured that it clearly is no longer consent. As mentioned above, the flicker rate of television & movies has a tendency to put people in a semi-hypnotized state. If TV was your babysitter, then you may have spent most of your life in this state, in which case, you may have been the victim of post hypnotic suggestion on a regular basis. Then you have to consider that many people fall asleep with the TV on. I used to do it myself. Looking back, I wonder how much garbage went into my psyche, or how much it affected my life & potential???
If you grew up with TV as a baby sitter, did you consent to it? I don’t think so. Did I consent to the trauma of a near drowning at 3y/o, whereby I was found floating face-down in a pool? Um, no. Did those little boys consent to genital mutilation in the form of circumcision as newborns? Nope. Does trauma have long term psychological effects on the brain. It sure does. It causes cortisol to be produced which is detrimental to long term memory. Could all the trauma we see in the news, all the false flags, all the actual trauma little babies go through before 3 years old, could all that trauma be caused specifically to make it harder for people to remember & then see the sequence of events that seem to be leading our world into a scientific dictatorship? Where is the consent in that picture?
Does TV programming contain hidden subliminal messages in the design? I feel that has been established by those who have examined various movies & television shows for these hidden messages. Do these hidden messages directly access the subconscious mind when a person has been entranced by the flicker-rate? It seems obvious to me. It is trauma-based mind control.
Trauma is often done at birth, repeated at various stages throughout one’s life, and is combined with flicker-rate trances & post-hypnotic suggestion. It’s a formula.
Consent is manufactured using mind control.
Mind control, by definition, removes freewill.
Therefore consent for the current systems of slavery, whether they involve debt, government welfare, nonconsensual human experimentation, or any other form of slavery, is never legally obtained by the enslaver, no matter what they try to make us believe.
How Do “they” Get Away With It?
If you ever wonder how big corporations & wealthy, elitist families have been able to amass so much power & get away with so many crimes (often swept under the rug, hidden from the masses), you might consider the law of attraction & the archetype of “Lady Justice“. Although, after what I have seen, it would be more accurate to call this an “arche-typo“, because it certainly seems to be in error. Sadly, I know it was anything but an accident that justice has indeed been made blind.
I have covered the “Justice is Blind” meme in multiple documents online, as well as in some videos. I am writing about this in yet another article because it is the biggest example that shows proof for what I call “archetypal transference“, which has been used to manipulate reality, to the benefit of the powerful & wealthy, & to the detriment of the mind-controlled masses.
ar·che·type (from dictionary.reference.com)
1. the original pattern or model from which all things of the same kind are copied or on which they are based; a model or first form; prototype.
2. (in Jungian psychology) a collectively inherited unconscious idea, pattern of thought, image, etc., universally present in individual psyches.
transference (from freedictionary.com)
[ˈtrænsfərəns -frəns] n
1. the act or an instance of transferring or the state of being transferred.
2. (Psychoanalysis) Psychoanal the redirection of attitudes and emotions towards a substitute, such as towards the analyst during therapy.
How many times have you heard the phrase “Justice is Blind” repeated in your life? You might assume it means that justice is fair & impartial, but is that really what it means? Have you ever noticed what the archetypal image of “Lady Justice” looks like? She is most commonly shown blindfolded, holding scales & a sword. This means that the archetype of justice cares not about the way people are mind controlled into doing or becoming things that are looked down upon, as long as the scales are balanced.
So the corporation that poisons the majority of the population of one country is “A-Okay” in her book, as long as they provide housing or healthcare for the starving peoples of another country.
Oh, wait… that’s right… she’s blind! No wonder!
Case in point:
Tobacco companies make their products more addictive than natural tobacco is, in order to make people continue to purchase their product, & have no consideration of the effects of these products on their market. No matter how you feel about smokers or ex-smokers trying to sue the big tobacco companies, some of you may remember a time when doctors were telling their patients that smoking was healthy & led to a longer life.
“Companies like Phillip Morris and RJ Reynolds participated in medical conventions by sponsoring doctors’ lounges and giving away free cigarettes. But the most inventive method to influence physicians was RJ Reynolds’s creation of its Medical Relations Division.”
Several years ago, there were major, class action lawsuits aganst certain tobacco companies. In some cases, these lawsuits were won by the claimants because it was proven that the companies knowingly caused their product to be more addictive than natural tobacco is. So, now these families are awaiting the money, from the tobacco companies, awarded to them by the courts. It is taking them years to pay these claimants, & in the meanwhile, the victims are slowly dying off. It is probably similar in most class-action lawsuits against powerful corporations.
How were companies able to get away with this stuff then? How do companies pushing genetically modified foods & hormonally tampered with farm animals get away with it now?
Check that “Justice is Blind” archetype, & consider how often the idea & phrase are repeated by people in the general population. I contend it is one of the biggest reasons why big companies have been able to get away with so many injustices in this world.
Also, please consider the fact that this phrase has been around Since about the 15th century. This means that the phrase has been repeated by an ignorant public for what – 5 centuries now? If you are familiar with Law of Attraction, then you understand the ramifications of so many people repeating such a phrase for so many years. So, just what have we unwittingly attracted to ourselves?
Image credit for the cigarette ads goes to: http://www.healio.com/hematology-oncology/news/print/hematology-oncology/%7B241d62a7-fe6e-4c5b-9fed-a33cc6e4bd7c%7D/cigarettes-were-once-physician-tested-approved
https://musicis2words.wordpress.com/2012/09/07/as-above-so-below-are-we-programmed-by-archetypes/ (for more examples of archetypal transference)
musicis2words ©2014 All rights reserved
Copyright Disclaimer: Images used under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
“Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.”
I have covered various aspects of this concept in videos & other articles. To me, it relates to occult knowledge & is used as a form of sorcery to manipulate reality by using the very people that are being relegated to a state of unseen & unspoken form of slavery.
I have come to the conclusion that many common phrases may have been made to become memes which, when repeated, would become spells through the “law of attraction”. Some of the intent behind these memes seems self-evident. The intent behind other memes in this list may be hidden, just as the intent behind certain symbols may be hidden.
So here are some examples of memes that I feel were put in place with the purpose of causing the condition described within them (I’ll add to this list as more of these memes come to mind):
1) “Justice is Blind” (https://musicis2words.wordpress.com/2013/09/20/why-is-justice-blind/)
2) “Truth isn’t Pretty”
3) “Life isn’t Fair”
4) “You Can’t Fight City Hall”
5) “Knowledge is Power”
6) “Power Corrupts”
7) “Freedom isn’t Free”
8) “Silence Equals Consent”
9) “As Above, So Below” (if that’s the case, then we’re in more trouble than I thought!)
So people repeat these phrases often, believing they mean one thing, when they may have a different meaning hidden from them. They may believe the phrases are simply portraying things as they are. What if they are ways to get people to attract the content of those memes to them?
It’s just a theory.
Why Is Justice Blind?
If you were completely foreign to the meme, “justice is blind“, how would you view that statement or its associated archetype? Would you not find the idea of justice that cannot see as strange?
While I have covered this particular meme in other documents about Archetypal Transference, I wanted to address it specifically in a document that is shorter & therefore easier to read.
The phrase “justice is blind“, is said to mean that justice is impartial, or that it is not biased, but I strongly disagree. The latter phrase is only two more syllables than the former. Is it really that much harder to say “justice is impartial”? How about “justice is fair“? Wouldn’t that last phrase be more accurate if one was trying to imply hat justice was “impartial”?
I believe the phrase “justice is blind” is a type of spell. It has become a sort of self-replicating meme, repeated by people who believe it means something other than what seems to be the actual intent behind such a phrase. The more people repeat it, the more the situation has become so. This is readily evident in the world today, if you’ve been paying attention.
If you are a victim of someone else’s misdeeds & find it difficult to get justice for your cause, you may understand this.
If you recognize the structure of western society, whereby corporations continue to rip of consumers by not only removing jobs from the country that spends the most money on their products, but by also ripping off their new employees in foreign countries by paying them less than a decent or living wage for their labor, & then rips off the consumer by skimping on their labor & raw materials, thus creating a substandard product, then you may recognize how justice has been anything but fair lately.
If you understand that the creation of the fed has helped to put the USA in ruin, then you may see the larger truth of what I am saying.
If you see how a relatively small portion of the population is wrongfully profiting from other people’s suffering, then you are seeing an effect of Archetypal Transference related to the whole “justice is blind” concept….
You may see the actual ramifications of getting people to repeat the phrase, “justice is blind”, over & over again over a period of many years, since around the 15th century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Justice).
If you do an internet search for the phrase, “justice is blind“, you may find more than one definition of it, many of which continue to point to the idea that it means that justice is impartial. This is a fallacy, designed to snow you, the public, into bringing about the condition of your own slavery, using what is referred to as “the law of attraction”.
The familiar icon, of the blindfolded woman holding the so-called scales of justice & a sword, is an archetype…. or is it an “archetypo“? Why would anyone want justice to be blind? Can she see how those scales are (in reality) way of balance? Apparently not.
To answer the question of the why, one must understand who profits & benefits the most from this forced manipulation of reality. Discover who controls most of the world’s wealth, & you will see who is behind this spell of a meme that began centuries ago, & has created a real dystopia for those who are the victims of this unfair & biased system of things.
I honestly feel that it is time to take the blindfold off of “Lady Justice” so that she may finally be able to do her job correctly. Justice should be fair, not blind.
Copywrited©2013 musicis2words rights reserved
The Disney Princess Movies and their Impact on the Human Family Addendum
I recently published a document about the Disney Princess movies and their impact on the human family through a process called “Archetypal Transference”, which is defined as the unconscious projection of archetypes that exist in the collective unconscious, due to repetition. I talked about how these movies become a form of programming, causing a little girl to subconsciously identify with the princess role, and unconsciously project the roles of other characters onto prominent people in her life. I mention how these movies, and the reinforcement of their programming via countless princess products on the market, seem to have the effect of causing females to be “high-maintenance”, and drive a wedge between mothers and daughters on a subconscious level. I also mention how sexual subliminals serve to inhibit spiritual growth by focusing the subconscious mind on baser desires in general.
What I neglected to discuss in the original document (https://musicis2words.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/archetypaltransferencedisneyprincessmovies) is a concept known as “learned helplessness”. This form of learned helplessness differs from the more commonly known definition of the term, which describes an animal or person who experiences this effect when they are exposed to repetitive abuse and trauma, with no escape (see below). The form of learned helplessness I am referring to comes as a result of being programmed by movies that feature the male “hero”, and the female “damsel in distress”. By and large, the majority of princess films and action movies reinforce these archetypes, and encourage females to subconsciously play the role of victim who will ultimately be rescued, which sets them up to be victimized for real, as they become adults, only, in many cases, that rescue never comes.
A key point here is that a female, who has been programmed in this way, winds up with a victim mentality & tends to identify herself in relation to her mate. This allows for very limited personal, emotional, intellectual, or spiritual development, which may result in an inability to become a whole person in her own right, depending on how extensive her programming is.
As I mentioned in my earlier document, the effects of this programming may vary, depending on the amount of trauma in a person’s life, due to the effects of trauma on the brain.
Not only are little girls programmed by these so-called feminine archetypes, but boys are usually programmed to be completely different, so men and women end up having personalities which seem to conflict. This programming seems to begin at birth, when boys are assigned blue and girls are assigned pink. On the color wheel, pink and blue are neither side-by-side, nor are they compliments. So on a symbolic level, males and females are immediately programmed to conflict with each other. I cover this in more detail in another article.
There does seem to be an agenda out there to disempower women on a subconscious level. While there are some movies out there that show strong female characters, the majority of fantasy and action movies especially, feature a strong male who must rescue a helpless, or at least less capable, female. Another type of programming in these movies can be seen in how the male role has growth and character development that is not found, or is negligible, in the female role.
Being exposed to these archetypes, over and over again, certainly becomes a form of subconscious programming.
Again I find myself wanting to understand why this is happening on such a large scale.
Well, I have heard one author say that we are dealing with “man’s ancestral hatred of women”. The subjugation of women would certainly be explained by this idea. We must ask ourselves: has it served society, humanity, and our planet for this particular theatrical theme to be repeated ad-nauseum? I think not. In fact, one thorough look at the state of our world shows how no one seems to be completely satisfied with our current reality. In fact, even the wealthy seem to be trapped in a state of subconscious and insatiable need. One need only to look at the various forms of addiction that exist in our world to see this is the case. The proliferation of war, poverty, and disease shows us that the current locus of societal control is not where it should be. The number of people who have so-called mental illnesses is staggering these days. Could this be a byproduct of the imbalance perpetuated by this programming? Perhaps if a more natural order was allowed to develop in human society, then we might see a better world, whereby everyone can be satisfied and live in harmony with one another. Instead, most of us are being programmed by these stereotypes and archetypes that seem to have become the hallmark of an unnatural system, bent on usurping the power of others, both male and female.
Programming allows for no individual development, forces people into predefined roles, and removes a measure of freewill. It also makes people more predictable and therefore easier to control. However, since it is done on such a subconscious level, most people do not recognize it and think that they are behaving in ways that are natural to them.
So is there any way out of this outdated rut of a program that we all seem to be adhering to, on some level or another? Well, one way would be if everyone stopped watching and exposing their children to these movies that reinforce these stereotypical roles onto people, but I don’t see that happening anytime soon. Therefore, the only way out would be to rise above this sort of programming. However, I have noticed that when I tried to rise above this programming, it seemed to kick in even stronger, and I felt a serious backlash from males.
There’s one more thing I want to throw out there, considering my recent research. I have been examining a certain acronym, about which there seems to be some debate regarding what the letters stand for. After hearing of how Hitler supposedly had a mickey mouse figurine on his desk, and after recognizing the existence of something called “Project Paperclip”, I have to wonder now if the MK in “MK Ultra” actually represents the words “Magic Kingdom”. I say this because there is a huge conglomerate monster involved in manufacturing Disney-based products, and perpetuating the programming therein, and there does seem to be a form of magic being used on people through these movies, and through programming in general, which not only divides women from men, but also has a tendency to make women into adversaries of each other, ala Cinderella’s stepsisters (for one example). The concept of “divide and conquer” keeps coming up when I look at the control of the human race through programming, in all its forms. By the way, does it strike anyone as odd that there is a Disney Land in California and a Disney World in Florida?
With regard to what I have read about the illuminati being formed in 1776: I feel that is complete disinfo. I say this because it seems like there has always been some elite group of people controlling the majority of the populations of this world. Even when there have been good men trying to bring people out of slavery and oppression, they seem to either get coopted or killed. I hope that this state of affairs doesn’t last. It is not a healthy system, and leaves most people disturbed on a subconscious level, leading them to have some emotional issue of one form or another, often causing some form of addiction, i.e. overeating, drugs, gambling, etc. as a way of coping with an unseen form of slavery which no one is allowed to notice, much less talk about.
It seems to me that we are indeed living in a world where an unseen form of slavery exists- just ask any TI who has experienced “intellectual property theft” or the “Truman Show effect”. Also, after considering the mass programming of female children, as mentioned above, it is not surprising to find the statistic out there stating that 75% of TIs are female who possess advanced educations and/or high IQs. This fact tells me that the power and abilities of this group are being usurped by a system that wants no challenges to its programming and authority, and would apparently like the majority of women living in the world to have low IQs and less education. Seeing the potentiality of this section of the population, in advance would behoove that system to preprogram these women into a victim mentality.
After reading my documents, and/or watching my videos, one might have the opinion that I am a feminist. I’m really not that. I don’t know what I am. What I do know is that the system in which most of us are living is unnatural and causes more problems than it solves. The fact that, in most cultures, women are subjugated and their opinions are often discounted by men and women alike, tells me that the way females & males are programmed could be a big part of the problems that are manifesting in our world today. If women were allowed to retain their natural strengths and abilities (meaning: if women weren’t programmed to be somewhat helpless and at odds with other women including their own mothers), would the world be a better place? Perhaps there would be fewer incidents of women trapping men by getting pregnant. Maybe there would be less “cattiness” exhibited between women. The only way to find out would be to try. Generally speaking, men have been in charge of the ruling organizations of this world for too long and the results have been favorable to the ruling class, and detrimental to the majority of the population, but I suspect that, on a spiritual level, it hasn’t really served either group.
About Learned Helplessness:
“learned helplessness, in psychology, a mental state in which an organism forced to bear aversive stimuli, or stimuli that are painful or otherwise unpleasant, becomes unable or unwilling to avoid subsequent encounters with those stimuli, even if they are “escapable,” presumably because it has learned that it cannot control the situation.
The theory of learned helplessness was conceptualized and developed by American psychologist Martin E.P. Seligman at the University of Pennsylvania in the late 1960s and ’70s. While conducting experimental research on classical conditioning, Seligman inadvertently discovered that dogs that had received unavoidable electric shocks failed to take action in subsequent situations—even those in which escape or avoidance was in fact possible—whereas dogs that had not received the unavoidable shocks immediately took action in subsequent situations. The experiment was replicated with human subjects (using loud noise as opposed to electric shocks), yielding similar results. Seligman coined the term learned helplessness to describe the expectation that outcomes are uncontrollable.
Learned helplessness has since become a basic principle of behavioral theory, demonstrating that prior learning can result in a drastic change in behaviour and seeking to explain why individuals may accept and remain passive in negative situations despite their clear ability to change them. In his book Helplessness (1975), Seligman argued that, as a result of these negative expectations, other consequences may accompany the inability or unwillingness to act, including low self-esteem, chronic failure, sadness, and physical illness. The theory of learned helplessness also has been applied to many conditions and behaviours, including clinical depression, aging, domestic violence, poverty, discrimination, parenting, academic achievement, drug abuse, and alcoholism.”