What is normally regarded “consent” cannot be considered consent if: it is forced, coerced, manufactured, mind controlled, silent, inferred, manipulated, uninformed, or misled. I reserve the right to add more to that list as I see fit.
It can only be considered consent if the party consenting knows exactly what all the ramifications are related to that consent.
How many times have you heard or read this phrase: “Silence equals consent“?
I’ve heard it said by many speakers & writers in the so-called “truth movement“. I read recently where it was called a ”legal maxim“, and that it was autoed from Plato. “Silence equals consent” is the way of the elitist pigs who run the world way to cheat their own game, which is rigged, by the way.
I mean, we already know they lie, so why believe a maxim that comes from elitist rulers who have filtered this phrase into the truth movement via their own infiltrators?
People talk about “waking up“… so what is “asleep“? It is when you are so mind controlled you cannot see what the system is doing right in front of your face, you are asleep or unconscious to what is really going on. You cannot “see the forest for the trees”, so to speak. If you are not truly conscious of what is happening, then how can you really give consent?
If you are aware of what is going on, but feel helpless to fight the system because you have been: threatened, manipulated, tortured, deprived, or lost your livelihood, then how is there any consent? You have been coerced. Coerced consent is not consent.
Why are people so unconscious? Well, first off, most people are prepped with trauma of some sort, at birth, or shortly thereafter. Then, they are hypnotized by the flicker rate of TV (which was my babysitter when I was growing up), and then given post hypnotic suggestion via every day phrases like “silence equals consent” or “justice is blind”, as a couple of examples.
That maxim is a lie because silence does not necessarily equal consent. More often it equals fear to speak out, or unconsciousness of the motive and the consequence. At this rate, given the various methods of mind control in existence today, sometimes even consent doesn’t really equal consent.
Whether silence equals consent is immaterial since mind control clearly does not equal consent. Regardless of what form it takes, mind control clearly equals removal of freewill. And, without freewill, how can someone give consent?
It’s kind of like the phrase “justice is blind”. They SAY it means that justice is impartial, but that is the lie…. & the system DOES lie to & manipulate the people. The phrase “justice is blind” is like a spell… to make it so justice does not see… so that people do not get true justice. I doubt anyone consented to that except for those who would profit from it.
Even more so, it is like a woman who gave consent to have sex after she had been drugged with ruffies. Was her consent legally obtained?
The stuff we see in the physical world today is the result of control that has been happening for millennia on levels most people cannot even conceive of, much less consider, which is why it works for those with power so well.
Sometimes, consent is SO manufactured that it clearly is no longer consent. As mentioned above, the flicker rate of television & movies has a tendency to put people in a semi-hypnotized state. If TV was your babysitter, then you may have spent most of your life in this state, in which case, you may have been the victim of post hypnotic suggestion on a regular basis. Then you have to consider that many people fall asleep with the TV on. I used to do it myself. Looking back, I wonder how much garbage went into my psyche, or how much it affected my life & potential???
Did I consent to have TV as a baby sitter? I don’t think so. Does TV contain hidden messages in the design? I feel that has been established by those who have examined various movies & television shows for these hidden messages. Do these hidden messages directly access the subconscious mind when a person has been entranced by the flicker-rate? It seems obvious to me.
Consent is manufactured using mind control.
Mind control, by definition, removes freewill.
Therefore consent for the current systems of slavery, whether they involve debt, government welfare, nonconsensual human experimentation, or any other form of slavery, is never legally obtained by the enslaver, no matter what they try to make us believe.